<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spreading the Link Love</title>
	<link>http://macksimpson.com/adverb/2006/08/26/spreading-the-link-love/</link>
	<description>The daily adventures of a Dallas ad monkey.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 08:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Mack Simpson</title>
		<link>http://macksimpson.com/adverb/2006/08/26/spreading-the-link-love/#comment-568</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 11:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://macksimpson.com/adverb/2006/08/26/spreading-the-link-love/#comment-568</guid>
					<description>Oooo... clever!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oooo&#8230; clever!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dabitch</title>
		<link>http://macksimpson.com/adverb/2006/08/26/spreading-the-link-love/#comment-565</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 09:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://macksimpson.com/adverb/2006/08/26/spreading-the-link-love/#comment-565</guid>
					<description>Cute! Oh here comes my annoying geeky &quot;but&quot;....except technorati only checks links that are visable in the RSS feed, and some sites (like mine for example) don't put all links in the small teaser part of the feed sent out. No biggie. But then add to it that technorati also misses a lot of blogs (that don't ping them) and you get a little less accurate link-in widget. Ideally you'd actually show the real ref's from your referer logs, but ref-spammers ruined that sort of fun. A combo of ping places like technorati might show more link-ins! I've got a widget that is a sorta pingback on mine, it collects all the referer links and I see which ones are real and which ones are pure spam so I approve the real ones. Seems no matter what these days, human eyes are the best way to weed out spam. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cute! Oh here comes my annoying geeky &#8220;but&#8221;&#8230;.except technorati only checks links that are visable in the RSS feed, and some sites (like mine for example) don&#8217;t put all links in the small teaser part of the feed sent out. No biggie. But then add to it that technorati also misses a lot of blogs (that don&#8217;t ping them) and you get a little less accurate link-in widget. Ideally you&#8217;d actually show the real ref&#8217;s from your referer logs, but ref-spammers ruined that sort of fun. A combo of ping places like technorati might show more link-ins! I&#8217;ve got a widget that is a sorta pingback on mine, it collects all the referer links and I see which ones are real and which ones are pure spam so I approve the real ones. Seems no matter what these days, human eyes are the best way to weed out spam. <img src='http://macksimpson.com/adverb/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://macksimpson.com/adverb/2006/08/26/spreading-the-link-love/#comment-520</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 06:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://macksimpson.com/adverb/2006/08/26/spreading-the-link-love/#comment-520</guid>
					<description>This is a really great idea!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a really great idea!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mack Simpson</title>
		<link>http://macksimpson.com/adverb/2006/08/26/spreading-the-link-love/#comment-516</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2006 22:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://macksimpson.com/adverb/2006/08/26/spreading-the-link-love/#comment-516</guid>
					<description>What can I say? It's a perfect storm of &quot;I'm lazy&quot; and &quot;I have no shame.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What can I say? It&#8217;s a perfect storm of &#8220;I&#8217;m lazy&#8221; and &#8220;I have no shame.&#8221;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Michael Seaton</title>
		<link>http://macksimpson.com/adverb/2006/08/26/spreading-the-link-love/#comment-515</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2006 20:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://macksimpson.com/adverb/2006/08/26/spreading-the-link-love/#comment-515</guid>
					<description>On going automated love.... me likey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On going automated love&#8230;. me likey.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
